|
frequently asked questions part 2
14/
What was Kubrick's A.I supposed to be about? Kubrick worked with several writers over the years, shaping the script,
Brian Aldiss, Bob Shaw and Ian Watson, among others (the latter actually
finished a script for Kubrick), meanwhile he kept one eye on the latest
developments in the field of special effects. The script was partly based
on Brian Aldiss' short story 'Supertoys Last All Summer Long' (1)
"Super Toys" Is a fable about a young synthetic boy and his talking companion
bear. The boy is confused about his existence and what is 'real' and if
he is indeed 'real' himself. The boy's 'Father' works for a company that
manufactures artificial people as servants, companions and to keep the
booming population under control.
The Father and Mother both want a real child through conception, but
await official permission to do so. In the end they are elated to be granted
permission, but seem puzzled at what to do with their artificial child
and its companion.
The basic thesis for the story appears to be a reworking of the Aldiss
short story, but the plot and narrative structure seem less familiar.
Kubrick had envisioned a New York of the future being swallowed up by
floods and tidal waves. More specific plot-points are vague, but several
of the contributors have leaked glimpses of the story line over the years.
One such scenario, given to me anonymously, would be that sometime later,
a boy would be found amongst the swamp-like ruins by an advanced group
of robots. At some point it would become clear that the boy himself was
an arcane version of these robots, long since forgotten.
This scenario is a far cry from the 'Waterworld'-like plot of Ballard's
'Drowned World' (1962'), which has long been rumoured to have been a source
for the film, but has never been confirmed. The novel describes that in
the latter half of the 20th century, the world has become immersed in
water due to a melting of the Earth's polar caps. The story begins several
decades after the catastrophe. Survivors spend their days avoiding the
blistering sun, living on makeshift boats or in the high rises that break
the swampy surface of the underworld. Coincidentally, Brian Aldiss gives
the book a glowing review on the back cover, which at least proves the
main contributor to the story - aside from Kubrick - had at least read
it and had likely drawn some inspiration, however small.
Although Kubrick's story was apparently to have tidal waves crashing
through cityscapes, there is no such mention in Ballard's book. However,
there are some brief descriptions of waves that splash methodically against
the sleek skyscrapers that protrude from the water's surface. This single
vision at least seems in tone with Kubrick's visual atmosphere for the
film.
What is more likely - at least on a personal level - is Watson's scenario,
which would follow the Aldiss story closely, but would spin off into a
more 'fairy-tale' journey that would take the viewer on a odyssey spanning
the boy's thousand year quest.
David (as he was named in Watson's script) was the first of a new model
of robot able to utilize 'virtual' emotion as part of its psychological
makeup. In Watson's script, it is apparent that David has been programmed
to love the couple that has acquired him, but cannot 'learn' to love others.
David's new 'parents' are a dissatisfied couple whose only child suffers
from an incurable disease and had been cryogenically preserved in case
a cure can be found. The parents are not allowed to have another child
and resent David playing the part of their 'child'.
When a medical breakthrough allows the daughter to be thawed out and
cured, David becomes redundant, and after a period of intense sibling
rivalry, the mother decides to rid herself of David. She sets him loose,
but to assuage her sense of guilt, tells him that he can return when he
becomes a 'real boy'.
David's quest eventually takes him to the drowned city of New York ,
where he finds a 'Pinocchio booth' at a Coney Island amusement park, which
is, along with a Ferris-wheel, located just above the waterline. The scene
ends with David seeing the model of the 'Blue Fairy', which he regards
with referential wonder.
The story then jumps ahead a thousand years, to a future in which robots
populate the world which is now run by computers. Humans are long extinct.
David's remains are discovered, his battery worn down, and revived by
these robotic inheritors of the Earth, who regard him as a link with a
mythological long-forgotten past. Sara Maitland. "He decided to make this film because he wanted people to shift to a
more positive view of A.I., he was quite open to me about that. Kubrick
was fascinated by artificial intelligence and fond of robots, which he
regarded as a more environmentally adaptable form of human being. He said,
'I think of them as I'd like to think of my great-grandchildren.' And
he's very fond of his grandchildren."
It was the relationship between David and his mother that most occupied
Kubrick and Sara Maitland. An alcoholic whose 'Bloody Mary' cocktails
David would mix for her in a vain attempt to win her affection. The mother
was the to be emotional center of the film that would eventually come
full-circle.
At the story's conclusion, the robots that have inherited the Earth
use David's memories to reconstruct, in virtual form, the apartment where
he had lived with his parents. Because his memories are subjective, the
mother is much more vividly realized than the father, and his stepsister's
room is not there at all; it is just a hole in the wall.
For Ms. Maitland, the film would end with David preparing a Bloody Mary
for his mother, the juice a brighter red than in real life: "He hears
her voice, and that's it. We don't see him turn to see her." Kubrick,
however, wanted a coda in which the new race of robots, because of a technological
limitation, cannot keep the mother alive after reviving her. The movie
would end with David in his mother's bedroom, watching her slowly disappear.
Ms. Maitland was displeased this scenario, and was furious with Kubrick
for insisting on it. "It must have been a very strong visual thing for
him," she says, "because he wasn't usually stupid about story. He hired
me because I knew about fairy stories, but would not listen when I told
him, 'You can have a failed quest, but you can't have an achieved quest
and no reward.' "
Other details regarding the film have recently surfaced, but specifics
are vague and sometimes just utter nonsense (we'll get to the nonsense
soon enough). But the few hard facts we have about the film come from
this source, a statement from Warner Brothers and a confirmation from
Industrial Light And Magic about being approached to deal with the special
effects shots.
The statement form Warner Bros. was released during pre-production for
'Eyes Wide Shut' and states:
"...Kubrick's previously announced sci-fi film, 'A.I.', believed to
be one of the most technically challenging and innovative special effects
films yet attempted, is in the final stages of set design and special
effects development, and will follow Eyes Wide Shut".
The confirmation from Industrial Light and Magic's involvement has always
been - until now - unclear to say the least. But a recent article from
the June 18th issue of Entertainment Weekly confirms that members of ILM
were indeed deep into development in regard to special effects for the
proposed film.
In the fall of 1993, Dennis Muren and Ned Gorman, who had previously
wowed audiences with the effects for the 'Star Wars' films, had been invited
to the Kubrick estate to talk about the monumental effects issues for
Kubrick's new film, 'A.I.'. Kubrick had begun pre-production in 1991,
but had lost interest when it became apparent the effects shots needed
for the film were beyond the capabilities of even the top special effects
people. A recent screening of Muren and Gorman's newest work on Steven
Spielberg's 'Jurassic Park' rekindled his interest in the project.
At his estate, Kubrick was shown a screening featuring a computer generated
pirate ship on the high seas. According to both Muren and Gorman, Kubrick
was left duly impressed, and grilled the two FX whizzes for over seven
hours. The two also indicated that Kubrick's level of knowledge in the
field of FX was astounding.
|
![]() |
For the lead role,
Kubrick had wanted the robot boy something along the lines of an androgynous,
Victorian doll. Muren and Gorman were shown a photo of Gainsborough's painting
'The Blue Boy' as an
example. Kubrick's concept was that the child should look a little too real.
And although it would become apparent that he wasn't human, he would in
the end, become the most humane character in the film.
When the ILM team returned to the U.S., they conjured up about fifty or so different ways visually to make it apparent that the child was indeed a synthetic creation. One such suggestion, which certainly plays into Kubrick's 'Pinocchio'-type odyssey for the boy, would be that of an internal manifestation or mechanism; some semblance of lights coming from inside the body. Another was symmetric freckles and moles on the child's face. Yet another idea was to give the child blank, doll-like eyes, that wouldn't focus on a point in space, but off into nowhere. One idea in particular sparked Kubrick's interest, and that was to have the boys face inhumanly balanced. In particular, the idea that the eyes might be farther apart than that of a human being. These spatial differences are what Kubrick was especially intrigued by. Whether Kubrick was to use a real actor and superimpose the head and face in post-production, or create a fully digitized actor is still unknown. Kubrick did eventually commission a test helicopter shot of an oil derrick in the North Sea, which he intended to digitally replace with the sunken spires of the New York City skyline. How these images of monuments rearing up from the oceans turned out is any ones guess. With no explanation, his interest temporarily waned, and he turned his attention to 'Eyes Wide Shut'. What Kubrick could have done with today's digital technology is something that will be debated for decades to come. For now, Kubrick's dreamlike fable will play out only in the midst of our imagination. AP Notes |
![]() |
A.I.
RUMOR MILL. WHAT'S TRUE, WHAT'S FALSE? READ ON...
TRUE: 1996, an amk contact received art work from AI. The artwork is an early draft, in later versions the side walls are huge ice formations." The metal arch type structure the two craft are lifting would represents a ruined Ferris Wheel encased in ice, and being harvested out by machines. Later the same informant reported AI, "has been shelved." An artist was hired to work at Stanley's house, to produce pictures of the Polar ice caps and of the Statue of Liberty under water. But after several months, the artist produced only one painting, and was let go from the project. The source did confirm the script was based on "Supertoys," dismissed the "kid from Jurassic Park" rumor, and reported that people were working with Stanley on computer morphing techniques. Later message: The source says that he'd be surprised if AI even gets started after EWS. It seemed likely that if it did happen, Kubrick would create his own effects team, because he wasn't happy with the ILM's work and its cost estimates. He couldn't confirm Ian Watson's involvement. Then the messages concerning AI ended after this. NOTE: FALSE: An outlandish rumor began on 'Dark Horizons, about Kubrick secretly shooting 'A.I.' over the course of several years (1), in order to capture the child star's age progression into adulthood realistically. Jan Harlan recently called this "Total nonsense," but adds, "... we did test Joseph and he was put on a contract, but then he didn't do the film." TRUE: What we do know is that Kubrick was impressed with the young actor after seeing him in 'Jurassic Park', and possibly wanted him to play a major role in the holocaust drama 'Aryan Papers' (2) , which Kubrick had intended to either produce or direct. Mazzello's agent has publicly stated his client was put under contract for two years, but that when the contract expired, renewal was not sought out by Kubrick, who by then had turned his interests to 'A.I' and 'Eyes Wide Shut'. TRUE: Video director and artist Chris Cunningham (Bjork - 'All is Full of Love'; Aphex Twin - 'Come to Daddy') was hired by Kubrick to make little robot-type humans for A.I., and that he did spend time with him actually making a few of them. Jan Harlan recalled to Steven Rose of the Guardian "We did try to build remote control machines and stuff like that. We tried to construct a little boy with a movable rubber face to see whether we could make it look appealing. But it was a total failure, it looked awful." INTERESTING FACT: Kubrick consulted with Hans Moravec of Carnegie-Mellon University, whose book on artificial intelligence "Mind Children" became Kubrick's standard reference. INTERESTING FACT: Kubrick also commissioned the British illustrator Chris Baker to draw scenes for his future world. TRUE: He was working on pre-production on AI and EWS simultaneously. Terry Semel told Paul Joyce, (3i) "He was preparing "AI" for some time, as he was "Eyes Wide Shut" and he was determined after the screenplay that collectively we did not go forward on it, which was really his choice. He decided to have more than one choice the next time. So he took an extra year or two and was working on more than one project at the same time. One was Eyes Wide Shut and the other was AI. FALSE: The film was shooting concurrently with EWS in a St. Albans property that used to be a bacon factory that Kubrick had bought and converted in to a studio. Although Chris Cunningham, built robots for Kubrick there and it has been reported that parts of Eyes Wide Shut were indeed shot in the converted bacon factory. TRUE Contrary to what has been reported here before, Steven Spielberg received over 900 pages of fax-notes from Kubrick, regarding AI. Jan Harlan Kubrick brother in law said to Steve Rose of the Guardian "He and Spielberg spoke all the time," he continues. "I have six or seven years' worth of correspondence between them over AI, which I recently passed over to Spielberg along with over 1,000 drawings." Harlan told Paul Joyce, (3ii) "He said on more than one case - "I think the ideal director for this may be Steven Spielberg. If I do it, it may be too stark. I may emphasise too much the philosophical side. Harlan maintains that Kubrick would certainly have returned to AI after
Eyes Wide Shut. "He had no intention of dying, I assure you. But at one
point, Stanley actually said to Spielberg: 'You would be the best guy
to direct this film, I'll be the producer.' I can't tell you whether he
would have directed it himself or given it to Spielberg. That was still
very much a possibility." (4)
MB
(2) See Information on Aryan Paper in the next
question 16. (back)
(3i) & (3ii)Terry Semel and Jan Harlan quotes from "The Last Movie:
Stanley Kubrick & Eyes Wide Shut" a film by Paul Joyce.
(4) Guardian Interview with Jan Harlan available on-line at Filmunlimited.co.uk.
Some of the abandoned projects mentioned in this list were in a more
advanced stage of development than others, although apart from AI
and Napoleon, lack of information makes it difficult to ascertain
which ones, hence the list is arranged in alphabetical order and approximately
dated.
AI The Aryan Papers (1980s) Script written, though not known whether other writers were involved.
Uma Thurman and Julia Roberts were considered for the female lead while
Joseph Mazzello had been selected to play the young boy. Locations had
been chosen but the film was cancelled a few months before principal photography
was to begin.
"We were very committed to do this film," Harlan recalls. "We had done
enormous amounts of research and preparation, but there came a point when
he and Warner boss Terry Semel decided it would be better to do AI first.
It had to do with Schindler's List," he said. "It was such a good film
and so successful, and Stanley's film would have come out about a year
later. He'd already had this experience with Full Metal Jacket, which
came out the year after Platoon, and that hurt us, there's no question
about it." So in 1995, The Aryan Papers was abandoned and Kubrick returned
to AI.
Note: Blue Movie (late 1960s early 70s) The Burning Secret (mid 1950s) Foucault's Pendulum (1980s) The German Lieutenant (late 50s) I Stole 16 Million Dollars (late 50s) Last Exit To Brooklyn (1960/70s?) The Last Parallel (1950s) Napoleon (1960s early 1970s) Of all his abandoned projects, Napoleon (and AI) were the most prominent
also-rans. (Napoleon even received a mention in Arthur C. Clarke's 'Rendezvous
with Rama'!) Originally slated to follow 2001, then A Clockwork
Orange, Kubrick discussed Napoleon at some length in several interviews
(2) around the late 1960s early
1970s. With Jack Nicholson confirmed to play the eponymous emperor, Kubrick
plans for Napoleon would have made it easily the most ambitious project
he had ever attempted. The film was to feature battle sequences filmed
by helicopter with thousands of troops marching in historically accurate
formations. Certainly, if the film had ever been made, it would have been
to be an epic on the grandest of scales.
Years later, after the release of Full Metal Jacket, Penelope Gilliatt
(3) asked Kubrick what had happened
to the film. "I'm not sure that in three hours you could do justice...."
was his pragmatic response
For more information on this abandoned project go to Darryl Mason's
generally informative article at salon.com.
Notes: (2) See The Joseph Gemelis interview on The
Kubrick Site, for more information on Napoleon. (back)
(3) Penelope Gilliatt interview also on The
Kubrick Site.
One Eyed Jacks (late 1950's) TV series based on the film Operation Mad
Bull (late 1950s) The Passion Flower (1960s?) Perfume (1980s) Schindler's Ark The 7th Virgina Cavalry Raider (1958) The Shadow Knows (late 1970s) Traumnovelle - starring
Steve Martin (1980s?) FQ, AP, AF, RM, ME, PT Stanley Kubrick (1)
The final scenes of 2001 depict Bowman; taking an interstellar journey, arriving at an alien white room and turning into a star child. Kubrick was often drawn by interviewers to offer his own interpretation of these enigmatic events but would not discuss them, due he said to the conviction that by providing such a road map, he would destroy the mystery of the film. He did say to Rolling Stone magazine about the film that, "On the deepest psychological level the film's plot symbolizes the search for God, and it finally postulates what is little less than a scientific definition of God [...] The film revolves around this metaphysical conception and the realistic hardware and the documentary feelings about everything were necessary in order to undermine your built-in resistance to the poetical concept. " Arthur C. Clarke's novelisation, published after the films release seemed to many to explain the ending of the film more clearly, although purists are quick to point out that the novel differs in many key respects from the film, and should therefore not be regarded as the skeleton key to unlock it. Certainly most people are in agreement on the following: that the room seems to represent some kind of interface between the aliens and Bowman. Perhaps a test? Or a cage of some sort? And his transformation into the baby is a kind of step up the evolutionary ladder for humanity. It is worth noting a quotation in an article from the New York Times, circa 1966 in which Kubrick gave credence to interpretations of 2001 based of the book 'Also Sprach Zarathustra' (Thus Spoke Zarathustra) by German philosopher Frederick Nietzsche. In the article, Kubrick appropriated Nietzsche's dictum that: 'man is a bridge between the apes and the Supermen; a laughing stock,' when he said: "Man is the missing link between primitive apes and civilised human beings Man is really in a very unstable condition." (2) The other indication of a Nietzsche connection is the choice of Richard Strauss' tone poem, 'Also Sprach Zarathustra' for the title music to 2001. RM Further reading This answer has deliberately avoided going into all the various speculative interpretations of 2001 in any detail. This is because a vast number of explanations already exist on-line, covering the whole spectrum of theories from quite plausible to utterly bizarre. If you're curious to read more, a good place to start your search is : Kubrick On The Web which lists various interpretations. For more detailed essays on the subject go to The Kubrick Site. as it has many original essays dealing with this question. Note: Other quotation taken from William Kloman's article in
the New York Times: "In 2001, Will Love Be a Seven-Letter Word?" Available
online at
New York Times' Kubrick archive
From the Rolling Stone interview, 1987
Tim Cahill Stanley Kubrick Tim Cahill Stanley Kubrick Although Kubrick was publicly dismissive about connections in his films
his above statement needs to be set against the sheer amount of evidence
to the contrary.
Here are a few of connections, but please note: this list is not definitive.
Paths of Glory / 2001 Paths of Glory / The Shining Paths of Glory / Dr. Strangelove / Barry Lyndon / Full
Metal Jacket. Spartacus / Lolita Lolita / Dr Strangelove Lolita / 2001 Lolita / The Shining Lolita / The Shining Dr Strangelove / 2001 Dr Strangelove / 2001 / A Clockwork Orange A Clockwork Orange / The Shining A Clockwork Orange / The Shining Barry Lyndon / A Clockwork Orange Barry Lyndon / A Clockwork Orange Barry Lyndon / Eyes Wide Shut Eyes Wide Shut / 2001 The Shining / Eyes Wide Shut A connection that never made it to the screen... ME, RM, TE, DK, NS, JB, CR RF & JM
See Kubrick
the Master Filmmaker For more self-referential connections and homages
to Kubrick from other filmmakers. a) In the early 50's Kubrick took a job as second unit director
on the "Omnibus" television series in the US for Richard de Rochemont.
He work on some ofd the 5 episodes of the life of Abraham Lincoln. Kubrick
was brought in to work on Lincoln for about a week shooting second unit
in Kentucky.
b) Kubrick's directorial flair had caught
the eye of Marlon Brando and he hired him for six months for a fee of
a reported $100,000 to work on a screenplay and direct the Western "One
Eyed Jacks (originally penned by Sam Pekinpah) with Marlon Brando and
Calder Willingham as co-writers. When Kubrick took a look at the script
he knew at once that it "needed work," and pitched in to solve its inherent
problems. Five months later, after a series of conferences with Brando
and associates, his contractual time was up, and he left the film. Kubrick
has said that the relationship ended amicably a few weeks before Marlon
began directing the film himself.
c) Ken Adam reported that Kubrick helped
him set up the lighting of the tanker set of The Spy who Loved Me.
They had built the set but the director of photography was afraid how
the whole thing was going to be lit. Adams asked Kubrick to come in for
some advice and he agreed on the condition that no one knew what was going
on. He was afraid it might cause a bit of a ruckus and was also supposed
to be working on 'The Shining' at the time. So when no one else was about,
he creeped in to help with the set-ups.
FQ, RM, ME In early June of 1999 Frederick Raphael was asked to write an article
for New Yorker Magazine entitled 'A Kubrick Odyssey', about his experiences
working with Stanley Kubrick on what was to become Eyes Wide Shut.
Raphael became concerned with a lack of title for the project when they
were deep into rewrites and faxed Kubrick a possible contender: 'The Female
Subject.' Kubrick reportedly did not acknowledge receipt of this suggestion
but some days later proposed 'Eyes Wide Shut' as the title he had decided
upon.
There has been much speculation on amk as to what the title means and
where it originated. The most popular contention is probably that he took
it from a 1968 congratulatory fax from film director Franco Zeffirelli
for '2001.' Zeffirelli said: 'You made me dream with my eyes wide open.'
(1)
Another reference points to Kubrick's friend John Le Carré's novel
"The Night Manager" which was written in 1993 which is about an arms dealer
who seems as charming as Zeigler, just about as cold blooded. On page
270 of the US hard bound edition a very distraught femail character finally
realizes she is little more than a gangster's moll and says "I'm in deep
shit. I walked into this with eyes wide shut."
Recently it was suggested that it might have been inspired by a quotation
by Benjamin Franklin: "Keep your eyes wide open before marriage, half
shut afterwards." Strangely enough, Raphael might have been more responsible
for the title than he was aware. for in his 1980 novella based on the
myth of Gyges, 'The Hidden I' (1)
he wrote: "Now what was left of that airless complicity in which nothing
(she swore) could come between them? Now she was enlightened. Her eyes
were open while his were shut. She saw it all".
AP, MJ, JO
Notes: (2) Schinitzler's novel can also be found under the titles 'Traumnovelle'
or 'Rhapsody: A Dream Novel' (back)
(3) The Hidden I: A Myth Revised by Frederic Raphael with
illustrations by Sarah Raphael was published in the UK by Thames And Hudson
in 1990. Kubrick was aware of "The Hidden I" because Raphael mentions
giving him a copy to him in his memoir of their collaboration.
"A Clockwork Orange was published in New York by WW Norton Inc.
later in the year. Eric Swenson, Norton's vice-president insisted that
the book lose its final chapter. I had to accede to this lopping because
I needed the advance, but I was not happy about it. "
When Burgess first viewed Kubrick's film he realised he had followed
the American edition of the book
Kubrick's opinion was expressed to Michel Ciment in an interview.
MC SK RM
Notes (2) The 21st chapter of A Clockwork Orange can be read
online at The
Kubrick Site.
Or see the contents section (below) for more answers. index |